Application Security Testing
Enterprise application portfolios are tested regularly. Scanners run. Reports are issued. Compliance requirements are met. That does not mean access is enforced correctly or critical workflows cannot be abused.
What often goes untested is who can access what, how transactions actually work behind the scenes, and how applications and systems integrate.
Our assessments focus on those areas across web, API, mobile, and software delivery pipelines—validating the controls in-place and demonstrating exposure before it becomes a business problem.
Web Application Testing
We determine whether your most important workflows and data are truly protected, not just compliant enough to pass an audit.
Mobile Application Testing
We determine whether controls still hold when the device cannot be trusted, not just when everything behaves as designed.
API Testing
We determine whether access rules actually hold, not just whether the system looks secure from the outside.
Source Code Review
We identify structural weaknesses that may not surface through normal testing but create significant exposure.
Software Delivery Security
We examine whether your software delivery process can be manipulated to introduce unauthorized changes.
Web Application Testing
We determine whether your most important workflows and data are truly protected, not just compliant enough to pass an audit.
Most web applications are tested annually. Automated scanners are run. A checklist-based assessment is performed. A report is delivered. Compliance requirements are satisfied.
Our assessments include full coverage of standard web application vulnerabilities, supported by automated tooling where appropriate.
Beyond that baseline, our testers manually evaluate the application the way a capable attacker would, asking:
Do access controls truly limit users to the data and functions they are meant to have?
Can high-value transactions such as payments, approvals, or account changes be manipulated?
Are administrative capabilities restricted to the right individuals?
Can business logic be used in ways the system designers did not intend?
Do integrations with other systems introduce exposure beyond the original trust boundary?
The question is not whether a scanner will find something. It is whether your application allows someone to reach data or transactions they were never supposed to touch.
When source code or architectural documentation is available, we incorporate it into the assessment to increase testing coverage and confirm real-world exploitability.
Every significant finding is validated and clearly explained, with impact defined in business terms.
Mobile Application Testing
We determine whether controls still hold when the device cannot be trusted, not just when everything behaves as designed.
Mobile applications place sensitive functionality and data on devices the organization may not fully control. The applications handle authentication, payments, and personal information while relying on backend systems that often assume the client behaves as intended.
Mobile applications can be reverse engineered, modified, or automated at scale, creating risk that is difficult to detect from the server side.
Our mobile testing evaluates both the application itself and its interaction with backend services, focusing on questions such as:
Do authentication and session controls remain secure when the device itself is compromised?
Is sensitive data exposed through local storage, backups, or device-level access?
Can high-value actions be initiated or manipulated from a modified device?
Does the backend rely on assumptions about the integrity of the mobile client?
Are communications between the application and backend properly protected and validated?
If a motivated attacker can reverse-engineer your app, clone credentials, and automate requests at scale — would your backend know the difference?
We test both Android and iOS applications. Effective iOS assessment in particular requires tooling, device preparation, and operational capability that many firms no longer maintain.
Where source code or architectural documentation is available, we use it to deepen analysis and confirm how controls are implemented in practice.
We document demonstrable exposure, explain the real-world impact, and provide clear guidance for remediation.
API Testing
We determine whether access rules actually hold, not just whether the system looks secure from the outside.
APIs often sit at the center of modern applications. They control how data is accessed, how transactions are processed, and how systems communicate with one another.
Our API testing is performed directly against the service layer, not solely through the user interface of the application.
Do access controls consistently restrict users to the data and functions they are authorized to use?
Are customer or tenant boundaries properly enforced?
Are authentication and token controls implemented correctly?
Can core business rules be bypassed through direct interaction with the API?
Do integrations create unintended access between different systems?
Your UI enforces the rules. But is anyone testing what happens when the UI is removed from the equation entirely?
When API documentation or source code is available, we incorporate it directly into the assessment to uncover undocumented endpoints, internal logic paths, and exposure that surface-level testing does not reveal.
Every material finding is substantiated, reproducible, and prioritized based on real-world risk.
Source Code Review
We identify structural weaknesses that may not surface through normal testing but create significant exposure.
Application testing is strongest when the implementation can be examined directly. While dynamic testing reveals how a system behaves externally, source code review provides visibility into how critical controls are actually implemented.
Our code review is manual and threat-driven, focusing on issues that require judgment and contextual understanding, including:
Inconsistent enforcement of access controls across different parts of the application
Business logic flaws that allow sensitive actions to be performed outside intended workflows
Privilege escalation paths created by edge cases or error handling conditions
Implicit trust relationships between components that are not visible through external testing
Custom security mechanisms that appear sound but fail under realistic use
Automated tools generate findings by volume. We answer the question that matters: are there structural conditions in your code that a capable attacker would exploit?
Source code review is often integrated into web, API, or mobile assessments to increase depth and validate exploitability. It can also be performed as a standalone engagement for high-impact systems.
Our objective is not to enumerate stylistic issues, but to identify conditions that create real exposure and provide clear, prioritized remediation guidance.
Software Delivery Security
We examine whether your software delivery process can be manipulated to introduce unauthorized changes.
Modern applications depend on automated systems to build, test, approve, and release code into production. These systems govern who can modify software, how changes are validated, and how releases reach customers.
Compromise of the CI/CD pipeline can allow unauthorized code, backdoors, or redirects to be introduced into production through legitimate release mechanisms.
Our assessments evaluate the integrity of the software delivery process, including:
Who has the ability to modify source code and release definitions?
How is developer access controlled and monitored?
Can automated workflows be altered to execute unintended behavior?
How are build systems secured and isolated from unauthorized influence?
Are sensitive credentials stored and used securely during the build and release process?
Can software artifacts be modified between build and production deployment?
If someone can push code to production through your pipeline without being caught, they do not need to find a vulnerability in the application. They become the application.
Where weaknesses are identified, we validate impact by demonstrating how those conditions could be used to gain unauthorized access, extract sensitive information, or introduce unauthorized changes into the release process.
Our focus is on systemic risk within the delivery pipeline, not isolated configuration gaps.